/home/bill/web/My sports & clubs/natural- SAFIRE/231226 SAFIRE III email, [liquid hand-sized] plasma reactor with Edo Kaal concepts.html<BR>
Subject: Oil well radioactive materials "re-radioIsotopification" progress, Aureon Energy<BR>
<BR>
<BR>

Vimeo Link on the Aureon website : <A HREF="https://aureon.ca/">https://aureon.ca/</a> <BR>
Pick the first video - The Water Planet<BR>
<BR>
Aureon YouTube site : <A HREF="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNk0a5je9G8">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNk0a5je9G8</a><BR>
I couldn't get the transcript!! ("Show transcript" button") <BR>
<BR>
+-----+<BR>
Aureon Energy / The SAFIRE Project - Update - Water Planet<BR>
THE SAFIRE PROJECT<BR>
00:49:15 video length <BR>
1,428 views  Dec 24, 2023<BR>
<BR>
We have great news to report!<BR>
<BR>
During November and December, the SAFIRE Project achieved another significant milestone.<BR>
<BR>
We introduced a liquid medium, instead of gas and turned the liquid into a dense ionizing plasma and have successfully transmuted thorium into many stable non-radioactive daughter elements.<BR>
<BR>
The results have been validated by a third-party professional laboratory in the U.S. which specializes in this industry.<BR>
<BR>
In SAFIRE III we applied everything we learned from SAFIRE I and II and miniaturized the reactor. You can hold the SAFIRE III reactor in one hand as it is not much bigger than a coffee traveler.<BR>
<BR>
In accordance with our business strategy, the company is now focused on building a proper laboratory, which will be used to create a working prototype to commercialize and clean radioactive wastewater.<BR>
<BR>
There is a lot of work ahead of us and we want to take this opportunity to thank you for your support, whether it be encouragement, scientific or financial.<BR>
<BR>
We could not have made it this far without you, and we are privileged and honored to be surrounded by a great community of people whose vision will take us into a whole new era for humanity.<BR>
<BR>
We wish you all a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.<BR>
<BR>
With kind and warm regards,<BR>
The SAFIRE team<BR>
<BR>
www.aureon.ca<BR>
<BR>
<BR>

+-----+<BR>
00:04:55 oil well in North Dakota ready to send first produced samples (for testing)<BR>
<BR>

00:11:54 SAFIRE no longer basic research for Solar process
<UL>
<LI>now is an applied technology project, do not need big equipment
</ul>

00:13:27 team arrives from [California, Colorado, Maine, New Jersey, Ontario, Quebec] 
<BR>
00:15:09 elemental transformations of radio-active elements in fraccing wastewater : 
<UL>
<LI>[gas - SAFIRE II, liquid - SAFIRE III (design)]
</ul>

00:16:15 Instead of a particular atomic model, SAFIRE III uses Design of Experiments
<UL>
<LI>links cause & effect : not why, but set of conditions
</ul>

00:19:14 SAFIRE II liquid -> vapour -> gas, SAFIRE III liquid ?only? (doesn't say)
</ul>

00:20:09 tailor container to provide right chemistry for frac fluid (i.e. materials from chamber?)
<UL>
<LI>small changes big effect on transmutation
<LI>tells us process is incredibly sensitive to chemistry 
</ul>

00:22:56 developing a commercial process, so we must push SAFIRE III tests to failure<BR>
00:23:36 we now know failure limits 500% higher than planned experimental conditions<BR>
<UL>
<LI>jet airliners have 125% failure limit, so we are extremely safe
</ul>

00:24:04 SAFIRE III must be [efficient, resiliant, controllable], basis for commercial prototype
<UL>
<LI>SAFIRE II is all of above for days at a time (gas phase)
	<UL>
	<LI>peer review opinions of research not so relevant here: real question is does it work?
	<LI>hundreds of years of science has informed SAFIRE
	</ul>
</ul>

00:26:48 exploring 2 methods of transmutation :<BR>
<UL>
<LI>1) accelerate radioactive decay, compared to "natural" timescale :
	<UL>
	<LI>	Th[232, 90] 1.41e10y-> Ra[228, 88] 5.7y-> Ac[228, 89] 6.1s 
	<LI>-> Th[227, 90]		 1.9y-> Ra[224, 88] 3.6d-> Rn[220, 86]  55s
	<LI>-> Po[???, 84]		?34?s-> Pb[???, 82] ????-> Bi[???, 83] ????
	<LI>alternates after Bi yield same stable (non-radiactive) form of lead:
	<LI>-> Po[???, 84]?34?s	  -> Pb[???, 82] ????
	<LI>-> Tl[???, 81] ????	  -> Pb[???, 82] ????
	<LI>Want to speed up from radiative Thorium to non-radiactive lead.
	<LI>Want cost-competitive to commercialize.
	<LI>y= year; d= day; s= second; ???? I can't read atomic weight of isotope
	</ul>
<LI>2) nuclear rearrangement - eg SAFIRE II W (tungsten) -> 17 other lighter elements
<LI>who specialize in the handling of Tnorm in produced water
<LI>instead of [fission, fusion], perhaps more like chemistry "nuclear rearrangement"
</ul>

00:30:39 SAFIRE has working relationships with [oil producer, engineer, scientist, lab]s<BR>
<UL>
<LI>who specialize in the handling of Tnorm in produced water
<LI>Partners [RadPro, GelLabs] 
<LI>North Dakota very hight Tnorm levels Ra226
</ul>

00:31:28 new SAFIRE III chamber has passed all [variance, failure mode] tests<BR>
00:31:58 ability to change nucleus of atom opens door wide to possibilities<BR>
00:39:42 today add new element to formula : Th (thorium)<BR>
<BR>



+-----+<BR>
Howell's questions : <BR>
<BR>
00:04:55 oil well in North Dakota
<UL>
<LI>Does the North Dakota area have a high number of "huff & Puff" or other "Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage" horizontal frac pads?
<LI>Are radio-actives higher in precipitates of these oil well?  Or are there high losses in water or crude oil phases?
</ul>

00:20:09 tailor container to provide right chemistry for frac fluid 
<UL>
<LI>Do liquid chamber materials also have catalytic effect?
</ul>

00:28:10	2) nuclear rearrangement - is this from from Edo Kaal's group in German!!??<BR>